https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275684 The suit was dismissed as it was time-barred and not signed by a duly authorized person. The plaintiff failed to establish authorization for filing the suit, and it was filed beyond the limitation period. The court ruled in favor of the defendant on various issues, including the acceptance of the agreement draft and the refund of the amount received. No relief was granted due to the procedural deficiencies. Each party was ordered to bear their respective costs. en-us Fri, 15 Sep 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 12 Oct 2018 17:03:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275684 The suit was dismissed as it was time-barred and not signed by a duly authorized person. The plaintiff failed to establish authorization for filing the suit, and it was filed beyond the limitation period. The court ruled in favor of the defendant on various issues, including the acceptance of the agreement draft and the refund of the amount received. No relief was granted due to the procedural deficiencies. Each party was ordered to bear their respective costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 15 Sep 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275684