<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 671 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368705</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the reassessment proceedings were invalid under the second proviso to Section 12A(2) of the Income Tax Act, preventing reopening solely for non-registration for the preceding assessment year. As a result, the addition of Rs. 54,02,845/- to the taxable income was deleted, and the appeal of the assessee was allowed, overturning the decision of the Assessing Officer and CIT(A).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2018 09:54:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=538062" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 671 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368705</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the reassessment proceedings were invalid under the second proviso to Section 12A(2) of the Income Tax Act, preventing reopening solely for non-registration for the preceding assessment year. As a result, the addition of Rs. 54,02,845/- to the taxable income was deleted, and the appeal of the assessee was allowed, overturning the decision of the Assessing Officer and CIT(A).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368705</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>