<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 667 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368701</link>
    <description>Import consignments found, on examination and testing, to contain goods different from those declared in the Bill of Entry, including Nickel Oxide and mixed scrap of various grades, could not claim exemption under Notification No. 93/2004-Cus. The appellant failed to show that the declaration matched the actual goods imported or that the order was contrary to law, so denial of the exemption, confiscation, and duty appropriation were sustained. The impugned order was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2018 06:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=538057" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 667 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368701</link>
      <description>Import consignments found, on examination and testing, to contain goods different from those declared in the Bill of Entry, including Nickel Oxide and mixed scrap of various grades, could not claim exemption under Notification No. 93/2004-Cus. The appellant failed to show that the declaration matched the actual goods imported or that the order was contrary to law, so denial of the exemption, confiscation, and duty appropriation were sustained. The impugned order was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368701</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>