<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 658 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368692</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, remanding the case for reexamination of issues concerning property tax abatement and the exclusion of rent dues predating 01.06.2007 from the demand. Additionally, the Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2018 09:52:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=538044" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 658 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368692</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, remanding the case for reexamination of issues concerning property tax abatement and the exclusion of rent dues predating 01.06.2007 from the demand. Additionally, the Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368692</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>