<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 657 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368691</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the order that denied the refund of service tax on Custom House Agency (CHA) services for exporting goods. The Tribunal held that the appellant was eligible for the refund based on the clarification provided by the amendment to statutory provisions, allowing input services to be availed beyond the factory premises. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, citing previous decisions and the retrospective eligibility for rebate specified in the amended notification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2018 09:52:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=538043" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 657 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368691</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the order that denied the refund of service tax on Custom House Agency (CHA) services for exporting goods. The Tribunal held that the appellant was eligible for the refund based on the clarification provided by the amendment to statutory provisions, allowing input services to be availed beyond the factory premises. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, citing previous decisions and the retrospective eligibility for rebate specified in the amended notification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368691</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>