<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (8) TMI 8 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14804</link>
    <description>The HC held that a society&#039;s religious character does not bar registration under section 12A and the Commissioner erred in insisting that religious objects be removed from the bye-laws before consideration. Registration at this stage serves only to establish identity to claim benefits under sections 11 and 12; entitlement to exemptions will be determined later. The Commissioner may not require proof that income will not be spent for religious purposes as a precondition. Religious-nature objections need not be complied with; technical objections may be rectified. The respondent was directed to decide the application within one month and the writ petition was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2025 13:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=53804" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (8) TMI 8 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14804</link>
      <description>The HC held that a society&#039;s religious character does not bar registration under section 12A and the Commissioner erred in insisting that religious objects be removed from the bye-laws before consideration. Registration at this stage serves only to establish identity to claim benefits under sections 11 and 12; entitlement to exemptions will be determined later. The Commissioner may not require proof that income will not be spent for religious purposes as a precondition. Religious-nature objections need not be complied with; technical objections may be rectified. The respondent was directed to decide the application within one month and the writ petition was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14804</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>