<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 651 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368685</link>
    <description>Operating and maintaining a plant within the principal manufacturer&#039;s factory for production of crumb rubber modified bitumen was treated as manufacture, not management, maintenance or repair service. The reliance on Notification No. 214/1986-CE was rejected because that notification applies to removal of goods without duty from a job worker&#039;s premises and had no application where the work was performed inside the principal manufacturer&#039;s factory. As the activity was manufacturing in nature, it fell outside service tax on management, maintenance or repair. The demand for service tax, interest, and penalties was held unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2018 09:51:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=538034" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 651 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368685</link>
      <description>Operating and maintaining a plant within the principal manufacturer&#039;s factory for production of crumb rubber modified bitumen was treated as manufacture, not management, maintenance or repair service. The reliance on Notification No. 214/1986-CE was rejected because that notification applies to removal of goods without duty from a job worker&#039;s premises and had no application where the work was performed inside the principal manufacturer&#039;s factory. As the activity was manufacturing in nature, it fell outside service tax on management, maintenance or repair. The demand for service tax, interest, and penalties was held unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368685</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>