<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 650 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368684</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a tax dispute regarding spare parts used in maintenance services and incentives received under Business Auxiliary Services. The Tribunal held that the cost of spare parts need not be added to the service value, citing relevant precedent cases. Similarly, incentives received from the principal were not considered part of the service value, leading to the appeal being allowed and the demand for tax liability being set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2018 09:51:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=538032" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 650 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368684</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a tax dispute regarding spare parts used in maintenance services and incentives received under Business Auxiliary Services. The Tribunal held that the cost of spare parts need not be added to the service value, citing relevant precedent cases. Similarly, incentives received from the principal were not considered part of the service value, leading to the appeal being allowed and the demand for tax liability being set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368684</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>