<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 638 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368672</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the concrete mix manufactured by the appellant did not qualify for exemption under Notification 12/2012 as &#039;concrete mix.&#039; However, the demand beyond the normal limitation period was set aside, and penalties imposed on the appellant and the Project Manager were also revoked. The appeal was partially allowed in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2018 15:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=538016" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 638 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368672</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the concrete mix manufactured by the appellant did not qualify for exemption under Notification 12/2012 as &#039;concrete mix.&#039; However, the demand beyond the normal limitation period was set aside, and penalties imposed on the appellant and the Project Manager were also revoked. The appeal was partially allowed in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368672</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>