<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 636 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368670</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the related person allegation between M/s. Tubas and M/s. K.R. Metals, citing the Companies Act and the SACI Allied Products Limited case. It was determined that even if they were related, prices should be adopted for the same class of buyers, leading to the appeal being allowed as the demand for excise duty and penalty imposition was deemed unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2020 14:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=538012" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 636 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368670</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the related person allegation between M/s. Tubas and M/s. K.R. Metals, citing the Companies Act and the SACI Allied Products Limited case. It was determined that even if they were related, prices should be adopted for the same class of buyers, leading to the appeal being allowed as the demand for excise duty and penalty imposition was deemed unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368670</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>