<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 620 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368654</link>
    <description>The appellant was entitled to avail CENVAT credit on service tax paid by the job worker for job work, including material cost. The Member (Judicial) held that the appellant could claim the credit regardless of the service provider&#039;s payment correctness. Since the service provider opted to pay tax on the entire value, including material cost, without exemption, the appellant was allowed to avail the credit. The decision emphasized the service provider&#039;s discretion in choosing the tax payment method under service tax law, leading to the appellant&#039;s eligibility for the credit. The impugned order was overturned, and the appellant&#039;s appeal was successful.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2020 13:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=537993" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 620 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368654</link>
      <description>The appellant was entitled to avail CENVAT credit on service tax paid by the job worker for job work, including material cost. The Member (Judicial) held that the appellant could claim the credit regardless of the service provider&#039;s payment correctness. Since the service provider opted to pay tax on the entire value, including material cost, without exemption, the appellant was allowed to avail the credit. The decision emphasized the service provider&#039;s discretion in choosing the tax payment method under service tax law, leading to the appellant&#039;s eligibility for the credit. The impugned order was overturned, and the appellant&#039;s appeal was successful.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368654</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>