https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368650 The tribunal set aside the order holding the appellants liable to pay Central Excise duty and penalties for clandestine removal of goods. It found inconsistencies in the evidence provided by the Revenue, particularly in statements and weighment slips, leading to the conclusion that the documents were unreliable. Additionally, the tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants regarding the applicability of the SSI exemption and highlighted procedural non-compliance with Section 9D of the Central Excise Act, ultimately allowing the appeals and providing consequential relief to the appellants. en-us Tue, 10 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 12 Oct 2018 05:20:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368650 The tribunal set aside the order holding the appellants liable to pay Central Excise duty and penalties for clandestine removal of goods. It found inconsistencies in the evidence provided by the Revenue, particularly in statements and weighment slips, leading to the conclusion that the documents were unreliable. Additionally, the tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants regarding the applicability of the SSI exemption and highlighted procedural non-compliance with Section 9D of the Central Excise Act, ultimately allowing the appeals and providing consequential relief to the appellants. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 10 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368650