<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 607 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368641</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the classification of income as business income instead of short-term capital gain for Assessment Year 2006. The court found that the Assessing Officer&#039;s determination based on share transactions, including irregularities, purchases made out of borrowings, average holding period, and total volume of transactions, was correct. The appellant&#039;s argument that the assessee was not primarily engaged in share business but made strategic investments was dismissed, as the AO&#039;s application of relevant circulars and law was deemed appropriate. The appeal was dismissed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, emphasizing the importance of analyzing various factors in income classification cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2018 14:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=537958" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 607 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368641</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the classification of income as business income instead of short-term capital gain for Assessment Year 2006. The court found that the Assessing Officer&#039;s determination based on share transactions, including irregularities, purchases made out of borrowings, average holding period, and total volume of transactions, was correct. The appellant&#039;s argument that the assessee was not primarily engaged in share business but made strategic investments was dismissed, as the AO&#039;s application of relevant circulars and law was deemed appropriate. The appeal was dismissed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, emphasizing the importance of analyzing various factors in income classification cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368641</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>