<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 1504 - COMPETITION APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275662</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the finding of a breach of the Competition Act by the appellants, confirming the jurisdiction of the Competition Commission of India (CCI) over the pre-notification acts and the evidence of collusive bidding and cartel formation. It validated the investigation of tenders from other organizations and the 2011 tender, dismissing the appellants&#039; defenses. The Tribunal criticized the CCI&#039;s penalty calculation method, emphasizing the need for proportionality and relevant turnover, and subsequently adjusted the penalties: Rs. 15.70 lakhs for Sandhya Organic Chemicals Pvt. Ltd., Rs. 6.94 crores for United Phosphorous Ltd., and Rs. 2.91 crores for Excel Crop Care Ltd. The appeals were dismissed with these modifications.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2018 16:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=537946" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 1504 - COMPETITION APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275662</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the finding of a breach of the Competition Act by the appellants, confirming the jurisdiction of the Competition Commission of India (CCI) over the pre-notification acts and the evidence of collusive bidding and cartel formation. It validated the investigation of tenders from other organizations and the 2011 tender, dismissing the appellants&#039; defenses. The Tribunal criticized the CCI&#039;s penalty calculation method, emphasizing the need for proportionality and relevant turnover, and subsequently adjusted the penalties: Rs. 15.70 lakhs for Sandhya Organic Chemicals Pvt. Ltd., Rs. 6.94 crores for United Phosphorous Ltd., and Rs. 2.91 crores for Excel Crop Care Ltd. The appeals were dismissed with these modifications.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Law of Competition</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275662</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>