<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 601 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368635</link>
    <description>The Court set aside the order rejecting the application for a sunset review investigation on anti-dumping duty for Ductile Iron Pipes from China. It found the Designated Authority did not adequately consider the evidence provided by the petitioner and failed to comply with legal requirements. The Authority was directed to review the application within six months, extending the anti-dumping duty in the meantime. The petition was granted, and the rule was made absolute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2019 12:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=537925" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 601 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368635</link>
      <description>The Court set aside the order rejecting the application for a sunset review investigation on anti-dumping duty for Ductile Iron Pipes from China. It found the Designated Authority did not adequately consider the evidence provided by the petitioner and failed to comply with legal requirements. The Authority was directed to review the application within six months, extending the anti-dumping duty in the meantime. The petition was granted, and the rule was made absolute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368635</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>