https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275652 The Court found the respondent guilty of contempt for publishing a leaflet implying judicial partiality. While two respondents' apologies were accepted, one respondent's apology was insufficient. The Court imposed a punishment of imprisonment for a fortnight on the respondent, emphasizing the need to prevent interference with justice and uphold the law. The rule was made absolute against the respondent, directing his imprisonment and payment of costs. en-us Fri, 01 Oct 1954 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 11 Oct 2018 12:45:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275652 The Court found the respondent guilty of contempt for publishing a leaflet implying judicial partiality. While two respondents' apologies were accepted, one respondent's apology was insufficient. The Court imposed a punishment of imprisonment for a fortnight on the respondent, emphasizing the need to prevent interference with justice and uphold the law. The rule was made absolute against the respondent, directing his imprisonment and payment of costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 01 Oct 1954 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275652