<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 598 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, KERALA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368632</link>
    <description>The court ruled that the placement of medical instruments without consideration, coupled with a minimum purchase obligation for products, constitutes a composite supply. The principal supply is deemed to be the transfer of the right to use goods, subject to GST under the relevant notification. The attempt to split the supply through independent transactions to avoid higher tax rates applicable to composite supplies was considered a colorable business model.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2025 10:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=537904" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 598 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, KERALA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368632</link>
      <description>The court ruled that the placement of medical instruments without consideration, coupled with a minimum purchase obligation for products, constitutes a composite supply. The principal supply is deemed to be the transfer of the right to use goods, subject to GST under the relevant notification. The attempt to split the supply through independent transactions to avoid higher tax rates applicable to composite supplies was considered a colorable business model.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368632</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>