<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 590 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368624</link>
    <description>Appeals were not entertained because the tax effect was below the monetary threshold and no exception under the applicable low tax effect circular was found to apply. The Court recorded that the matters did not fall within the circular dated 11.07.2018, as amended on 20.08.2018, and therefore declined to hear them on merits. The Department was left at liberty to seek revival if it could later show that any recognised exception covered the cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2018 09:26:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=537894" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 590 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368624</link>
      <description>Appeals were not entertained because the tax effect was below the monetary threshold and no exception under the applicable low tax effect circular was found to apply. The Court recorded that the matters did not fall within the circular dated 11.07.2018, as amended on 20.08.2018, and therefore declined to hear them on merits. The Department was left at liberty to seek revival if it could later show that any recognised exception covered the cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368624</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>