<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Refund of Invalid Anti-Dumping Duty Approved; Funds Should Not Have Gone to Consumer Welfare Fund; No Unjust Enrichment Found.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=41968</link>
    <description>Refund of anti-dumping duty paid - test of unjust-enrichment - With the invalidation of imposition of anti-dumping duty, the duty collected in consequence should not, in these circumstances, have been credited to the Consumer Welfare Fund - Refund allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2018 09:13:45 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2018 09:13:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=537867" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Refund of Invalid Anti-Dumping Duty Approved; Funds Should Not Have Gone to Consumer Welfare Fund; No Unjust Enrichment Found.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=41968</link>
      <description>Refund of anti-dumping duty paid - test of unjust-enrichment - With the invalidation of imposition of anti-dumping duty, the duty collected in consequence should not, in these circumstances, have been credited to the Consumer Welfare Fund - Refund allowed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2018 09:13:45 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=41968</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>