<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 563 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368597</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing input service credit on insurance services for errors and omission policy and transit insurance policy for moving goods for installation activities related to telecommunication services. The errors and omission policy covering defects in software products was deemed eligible for credit as it had a direct nexus with the output service provided. Similarly, the transit insurance policy necessary for moving goods to the site for providing output services was also considered eligible for credit. The appeal was allowed with consequential relief, setting aside the disallowance of credit on both insurance policies.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2018 09:12:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=537858" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 563 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368597</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing input service credit on insurance services for errors and omission policy and transit insurance policy for moving goods for installation activities related to telecommunication services. The errors and omission policy covering defects in software products was deemed eligible for credit as it had a direct nexus with the output service provided. Similarly, the transit insurance policy necessary for moving goods to the site for providing output services was also considered eligible for credit. The appeal was allowed with consequential relief, setting aside the disallowance of credit on both insurance policies.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368597</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>