<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 557 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368591</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the adjudicating authority for re-quantification of the service tax demand, directing correct adjustment of advance rent received. The penalty imposed under Section 78(1) of the Act was set aside due to the interpretational nature of the issue and pending litigations. The appeal was partly allowed and partly remanded for further proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2018 09:12:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=537850" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 557 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368591</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the adjudicating authority for re-quantification of the service tax demand, directing correct adjustment of advance rent received. The penalty imposed under Section 78(1) of the Act was set aside due to the interpretational nature of the issue and pending litigations. The appeal was partly allowed and partly remanded for further proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368591</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>