<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 546 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368580</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal upheld the lower authorities&#039; decision, confirming tax liability, interest, and penalties imposed on the appellant for failing to deposit collected service tax. The appeal was rejected, and the impugned order was deemed correct and legal, requiring no interference.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2018 09:11:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=537836" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 546 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368580</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal upheld the lower authorities&#039; decision, confirming tax liability, interest, and penalties imposed on the appellant for failing to deposit collected service tax. The appeal was rejected, and the impugned order was deemed correct and legal, requiring no interference.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368580</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>