<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 543 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368577</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Hyderabad allowed the appeal, setting aside the penalty imposed under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. The Tribunal found that the appellant had paid the tax liability and interest before the issuance of show cause notices, rendering the penalty unwarranted. Relying on legal precedents and Section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994, the Tribunal concluded that the penalty was not justified in this case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2018 09:11:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=537832" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 543 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368577</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Hyderabad allowed the appeal, setting aside the penalty imposed under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. The Tribunal found that the appellant had paid the tax liability and interest before the issuance of show cause notices, rendering the penalty unwarranted. Relying on legal precedents and Section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994, the Tribunal concluded that the penalty was not justified in this case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368577</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>