https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368563 The Tribunal remanded the case back to the first appellate authority for further examination on the liability to reverse CENVAT credit for iron ore fines under Rule 6(3) of CCR 2004. The first appellate authority was directed to consider the appellant's arguments on the merits and limitation period in light of relevant case laws, as the previous decision failed to address these crucial aspects. The Tribunal did not delve into the penalty issue, focusing primarily on the CENVAT credit reversal liability. en-us Mon, 17 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 11 Oct 2018 09:10:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368563 The Tribunal remanded the case back to the first appellate authority for further examination on the liability to reverse CENVAT credit for iron ore fines under Rule 6(3) of CCR 2004. The first appellate authority was directed to consider the appellant's arguments on the merits and limitation period in light of relevant case laws, as the previous decision failed to address these crucial aspects. The Tribunal did not delve into the penalty issue, focusing primarily on the CENVAT credit reversal liability. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 17 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368563