<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 525 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368559</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the appellant was eligible to avail CENVAT credit for Central Excise duty paid on specified items used for machinery fabrication in a cement plant during the relevant period. The decision was based on consistent precedents where similar issues were decided in favor of assesses. The impugned order was set aside, and the appellant&#039;s claim for CENVAT credit was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2018 09:10:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=537812" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 525 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368559</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the appellant was eligible to avail CENVAT credit for Central Excise duty paid on specified items used for machinery fabrication in a cement plant during the relevant period. The decision was based on consistent precedents where similar issues were decided in favor of assesses. The impugned order was set aside, and the appellant&#039;s claim for CENVAT credit was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368559</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>