https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368555 The Tribunal rectified paragraph 6 of its earlier order after finding a mistake apparent on the face of the record. It corrected the observation that the appellant was entitled to SSI exemption and cum duty benefit, holding instead that the appellant, being registered with the department, was entitled to Cenvat credit on inputs and input services, with cum duty benefit, subject to verification by the lower authorities. The corrected paragraph was substituted in place of the earlier erroneous one under rectification jurisdiction. en-us Fri, 10 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 10 Oct 2018 13:59:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368555 The Tribunal rectified paragraph 6 of its earlier order after finding a mistake apparent on the face of the record. It corrected the observation that the appellant was entitled to SSI exemption and cum duty benefit, holding instead that the appellant, being registered with the department, was entitled to Cenvat credit on inputs and input services, with cum duty benefit, subject to verification by the lower authorities. The corrected paragraph was substituted in place of the earlier erroneous one under rectification jurisdiction. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 10 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368555