https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275641 The High Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, holding that the notice issued under Section 6 (7) of the CST Act for reassessment of turnover for the assessment year 2005-2006 was time-barred. The court found that the notice, issued beyond the limitation period, was invalid, affirming previous judgments in the petitioner's favor. Despite the State's appeal intentions, the court allowed the writ petition based on the established limitation issue, as decided by the Single Judge and upheld by a Division Bench. en-us Fri, 16 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 11 Oct 2018 06:22:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275641 The High Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, holding that the notice issued under Section 6 (7) of the CST Act for reassessment of turnover for the assessment year 2005-2006 was time-barred. The court found that the notice, issued beyond the limitation period, was invalid, affirming previous judgments in the petitioner's favor. Despite the State's appeal intentions, the court allowed the writ petition based on the established limitation issue, as decided by the Single Judge and upheld by a Division Bench. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Fri, 16 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275641