https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275637 A final approved nationalisation scheme under the motor vehicles regime continues to override ordinary permit provisions and excludes private operators from the notified route or any overlapping part of it. The 1986 draft scheme was held not to have lapsed under section 100(4) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, because the lapse period had to be computed from commencement in the circumstances described. Permits granted to private operators on the notified or overlapping routes were therefore without jurisdiction and invalid. The decision affirms the primacy of an approved scheme over competing private permits. en-us Tue, 31 Mar 1992 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 10 Oct 2018 17:11:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275637 A final approved nationalisation scheme under the motor vehicles regime continues to override ordinary permit provisions and excludes private operators from the notified route or any overlapping part of it. The 1986 draft scheme was held not to have lapsed under section 100(4) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, because the lapse period had to be computed from commencement in the circumstances described. Permits granted to private operators on the notified or overlapping routes were therefore without jurisdiction and invalid. The decision affirms the primacy of an approved scheme over competing private permits. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 31 Mar 1992 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275637