https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275636 A governmental decision taken under a mistake of fact, or affected by fraud or wilful suppression, may be revisited if the earlier order had not achieved finality. Where fresh facts indicate that the property was evacuee property and the persons concerned were the same, the State is not barred from examining the matter again. The text also notes that an adverse order should generally follow a fair opportunity to be heard, and that collateral writ proceedings are not the proper forum for conclusively deciding disputed questions of title, identity, or the validity of notifications. Judicial review remains limited to its proper scope. en-us Tue, 20 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 10 Oct 2018 17:02:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275636 A governmental decision taken under a mistake of fact, or affected by fraud or wilful suppression, may be revisited if the earlier order had not achieved finality. Where fresh facts indicate that the property was evacuee property and the persons concerned were the same, the State is not barred from examining the matter again. The text also notes that an adverse order should generally follow a fair opportunity to be heard, and that collateral writ proceedings are not the proper forum for conclusively deciding disputed questions of title, identity, or the validity of notifications. Judicial review remains limited to its proper scope. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 20 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275636