https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275635 Section 2 of the Indian Tolls Act, 1851 was treated as valid because the statute supplied sufficient guidance for executive fixing of tolls on roads and bridges made or repaired at public expense, so the levy and rate-setting were not impermissible delegation. Notifications issued under that provision were upheld because a general notification could cover bridges of the relevant class, and cost-based classification was held to be rationally connected with recouping construction or repair expenditure. The notification also exempted return journeys completed by midnight of the following day on production of the outward receipt. On the facts, the Hindon Bridge was found to fall below the higher-cost threshold, so only the lower toll rate applied and excess toll was refundable. en-us Tue, 21 Sep 1965 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 10 Oct 2018 17:00:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275635 Section 2 of the Indian Tolls Act, 1851 was treated as valid because the statute supplied sufficient guidance for executive fixing of tolls on roads and bridges made or repaired at public expense, so the levy and rate-setting were not impermissible delegation. Notifications issued under that provision were upheld because a general notification could cover bridges of the relevant class, and cost-based classification was held to be rationally connected with recouping construction or repair expenditure. The notification also exempted return journeys completed by midnight of the following day on production of the outward receipt. On the facts, the Hindon Bridge was found to fall below the higher-cost threshold, so only the lower toll rate applied and excess toll was refundable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 21 Sep 1965 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275635