https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275623 Adverse judicial remarks may be retained where the person concerned was given an opportunity to explain his conduct, the record contains material supporting the comments, and the remarks are necessary to decide the legality of the impugned action. The District Magistrate had been impleaded, was heard, and filed a detailed justification; the record also included material such as the police endorsement and his report, which supported the High Court's inference that the notice was not innocuous and was a preliminary step for possible prosecution. Because the remarks were integral to the finding on legality and arbitrariness, they were not liable to be expunged, and the refusal to expunge was sustained. en-us Fri, 01 Aug 1975 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 10 Oct 2018 12:48:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275623 Adverse judicial remarks may be retained where the person concerned was given an opportunity to explain his conduct, the record contains material supporting the comments, and the remarks are necessary to decide the legality of the impugned action. The District Magistrate had been impleaded, was heard, and filed a detailed justification; the record also included material such as the police endorsement and his report, which supported the High Court's inference that the notice was not innocuous and was a preliminary step for possible prosecution. Because the remarks were integral to the finding on legality and arbitrariness, they were not liable to be expunged, and the refusal to expunge was sustained. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 01 Aug 1975 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275623