https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275622 The Supreme Court criticized a High Court Judge for making unjustified disparaging remarks against a senior Advocate in a review petition, emphasizing the need for judicial sobriety. The High Court dismissed a review petition alleging fraud on the Court due to lack of locus standi and maintainability. The Advocate General faced criticism for alleged dishonesty in briefing the Chief Minister, leading to misleading statements. The Supreme Court found these criticisms unwarranted, stressing the importance of judicial discipline. The High Court's comments on the Advocate's conduct were deemed unjustified and lacking jurisdiction, leading to their removal from the order. en-us Thu, 22 Mar 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 10 Oct 2018 12:43:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275622 The Supreme Court criticized a High Court Judge for making unjustified disparaging remarks against a senior Advocate in a review petition, emphasizing the need for judicial sobriety. The High Court dismissed a review petition alleging fraud on the Court due to lack of locus standi and maintainability. The Advocate General faced criticism for alleged dishonesty in briefing the Chief Minister, leading to misleading statements. The Supreme Court found these criticisms unwarranted, stressing the importance of judicial discipline. The High Court's comments on the Advocate's conduct were deemed unjustified and lacking jurisdiction, leading to their removal from the order. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 22 Mar 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275622