<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1927 (12) TMI 4 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275620</link>
    <description>Under Section 60 of the Civil Procedure Code, only an existing and complete debt, or property that is presently saleable, is liable to attachment. Rent due from a subtenant that had not yet accrued on the date of attachment was treated as a future liability, not an existing debt or actionable claim. The term &quot;saleable property&quot; did not extend to such unearned rent, and the occupancy tenant&#039;s interest was not transferable in the manner asserted, save for the limited exception recognised by the Tenancy Act. Future rent not yet due was therefore not attachable, and the objection to attachment was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 1927 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2018 12:10:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=537733" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1927 (12) TMI 4 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275620</link>
      <description>Under Section 60 of the Civil Procedure Code, only an existing and complete debt, or property that is presently saleable, is liable to attachment. Rent due from a subtenant that had not yet accrued on the date of attachment was treated as a future liability, not an existing debt or actionable claim. The term &quot;saleable property&quot; did not extend to such unearned rent, and the occupancy tenant&#039;s interest was not transferable in the manner asserted, save for the limited exception recognised by the Tenancy Act. Future rent not yet due was therefore not attachable, and the objection to attachment was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 1927 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275620</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>