<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 489 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368523</link>
    <description>A foreign enterprise was held not to have a permanent establishment in India. Mere installation and use of software by Indian agents to access the enterprise&#039;s systems did not create a fixed place PE, and the agents were found to act in the ordinary course of their business without being wholly or almost wholly devoted to the enterprise. No dependent agent PE arose because there was no material showing authority, or habitual exercise of authority, to conclude contracts on the enterprise&#039;s behalf; the agents only performed the payment leg of transactions already concluded outside India. As no PE existed, no profit attribution arose and the interest issue under section 234B became infructuous.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2018 09:08:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=537700" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 489 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368523</link>
      <description>A foreign enterprise was held not to have a permanent establishment in India. Mere installation and use of software by Indian agents to access the enterprise&#039;s systems did not create a fixed place PE, and the agents were found to act in the ordinary course of their business without being wholly or almost wholly devoted to the enterprise. No dependent agent PE arose because there was no material showing authority, or habitual exercise of authority, to conclude contracts on the enterprise&#039;s behalf; the agents only performed the payment leg of transactions already concluded outside India. As no PE existed, no profit attribution arose and the interest issue under section 234B became infructuous.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368523</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>