<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 475 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368509</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the services provided by the appellant did not qualify as &quot;Clearing and Forwarding Agent Services&quot; under the Finance Act, 1994. As a result, the appellant was not liable to pay the Service Tax demanded. The impugned orders were set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief to the appellant. The decision was pronounced on 24/09/2018.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2018 09:07:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=537686" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 475 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368509</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the services provided by the appellant did not qualify as &quot;Clearing and Forwarding Agent Services&quot; under the Finance Act, 1994. As a result, the appellant was not liable to pay the Service Tax demanded. The impugned orders were set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief to the appellant. The decision was pronounced on 24/09/2018.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368509</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>