https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368496 The Tribunal, following the Supreme Court's direction, clarified that the nature of roller blinds as movable or immovable property was not crucial to the case. The final order was upheld with the exception of removing the observation regarding the blinds being movable property. The Tribunal emphasized that the assessment should be based on the form in which the blinds were cleared from the factory. The decision, rendered on 11/09/2018, concluded that the penalty imposition and distinction of case laws were adequately addressed, and there was no basis to recall the final order. en-us Tue, 11 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 06 Apr 2019 16:06:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368496 The Tribunal, following the Supreme Court's direction, clarified that the nature of roller blinds as movable or immovable property was not crucial to the case. The final order was upheld with the exception of removing the observation regarding the blinds being movable property. The Tribunal emphasized that the assessment should be based on the form in which the blinds were cleared from the factory. The decision, rendered on 11/09/2018, concluded that the penalty imposition and distinction of case laws were adequately addressed, and there was no basis to recall the final order. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 11 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368496