<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 461 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368495</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI allowed the appeal in a case concerning fraudulent export under the EPCG scheme and rebate claims on forged documents. The Tribunal remanded the matter for denovo adjudication, citing lack of opportunity for the appellant to be heard during the initial proceedings. This decision followed the dismissal of similar appeals by other noticees in higher courts, granting the appellant the chance to present fresh evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2018 09:07:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=537672" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 461 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368495</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI allowed the appeal in a case concerning fraudulent export under the EPCG scheme and rebate claims on forged documents. The Tribunal remanded the matter for denovo adjudication, citing lack of opportunity for the appellant to be heard during the initial proceedings. This decision followed the dismissal of similar appeals by other noticees in higher courts, granting the appellant the chance to present fresh evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368495</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>