<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 457 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368491</link>
    <description>Plastic jars manufactured in-house and used captively for packing the final product were treated as non-dutiable because excise liability depended on independent marketability, which was absent on the stated facts. The demand was also unsustainable because the assessee had a bona fide small scale exemption claim within the relevant threshold and there was no deliberate suppression of material facts. On that basis, both the duty demand and the impugned order were set aside, with consequential relief to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2018 09:07:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=537668" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 457 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368491</link>
      <description>Plastic jars manufactured in-house and used captively for packing the final product were treated as non-dutiable because excise liability depended on independent marketability, which was absent on the stated facts. The demand was also unsustainable because the assessee had a bona fide small scale exemption claim within the relevant threshold and there was no deliberate suppression of material facts. On that basis, both the duty demand and the impugned order were set aside, with consequential relief to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368491</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>