<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1963 (3) TMI 73 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275601</link>
    <description>In an impartible Hindu estate, later-acquired immovable property can be brought into the estate if a clear intention of incorporation is proved from conduct and surrounding circumstances, and property already incorporated before the governing statute remains within the estate. Buildings proved to have been incorporated were not divisible under the Estates Abolition Act, because the relevant vesting provision was construed as referring to the landholder. The Prince of Wales Market, the leasehold rights in nine villages, and 38 ceremonial jewels were upheld as impartible estate property on the basis of incorporation, accretion, and established family custom. The widow&#039;s claim to certain jewels as stridhan was restored by consent in modified form.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2018 16:27:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=537635" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1963 (3) TMI 73 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275601</link>
      <description>In an impartible Hindu estate, later-acquired immovable property can be brought into the estate if a clear intention of incorporation is proved from conduct and surrounding circumstances, and property already incorporated before the governing statute remains within the estate. Buildings proved to have been incorporated were not divisible under the Estates Abolition Act, because the relevant vesting provision was construed as referring to the landholder. The Prince of Wales Market, the leasehold rights in nine villages, and 38 ceremonial jewels were upheld as impartible estate property on the basis of incorporation, accretion, and established family custom. The widow&#039;s claim to certain jewels as stridhan was restored by consent in modified form.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275601</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>