https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275595 In an ancestral impartible estate governed by Mitakshara law, survivorship continues unless junior members clearly renounce their chance of succession; mere separation in food and worship is insufficient. Immovable self-acquired property may be incorporated into the estate by express or implied intention and then devolve with it, but movable property cannot be so incorporated on the same basis. Claims for rents, royalties and other sums accrued during the Raja's lifetime were treated as part of the same cause of action, and amounts paid under the bantannamas were allowable as credits in adjusting the parties' rights. The decree was therefore modified with further inquiry and consequential directions. en-us Thu, 07 Apr 1932 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 09 Oct 2018 15:16:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275595 In an ancestral impartible estate governed by Mitakshara law, survivorship continues unless junior members clearly renounce their chance of succession; mere separation in food and worship is insufficient. Immovable self-acquired property may be incorporated into the estate by express or implied intention and then devolve with it, but movable property cannot be so incorporated on the same basis. Claims for rents, royalties and other sums accrued during the Raja's lifetime were treated as part of the same cause of action, and amounts paid under the bantannamas were allowable as credits in adjusting the parties' rights. The decree was therefore modified with further inquiry and consequential directions. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 07 Apr 1932 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275595