https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275594 An impartible estate and properties incorporated with it were held to retain their impartible character unless a statute clearly altered that status, so Schedule B properties outside the estate limits did not become partible on abolition. The 1889 family arrangement for maintenance of plaintiffs 1 to 4 continued to operate to the extent it could be enforced against compensation and non-vested properties, with interest adjusted accordingly and any shortfall recoverable against specified assets. Plaintiffs 5 to 7 failed to establish any enforceable maintenance right under the agreement. The claim to partition the golden howdah was also rejected because the evidence showed it had not remained a subject of fresh partition. en-us Tue, 28 Oct 1969 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 09 Oct 2018 15:08:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275594 An impartible estate and properties incorporated with it were held to retain their impartible character unless a statute clearly altered that status, so Schedule B properties outside the estate limits did not become partible on abolition. The 1889 family arrangement for maintenance of plaintiffs 1 to 4 continued to operate to the extent it could be enforced against compensation and non-vested properties, with interest adjusted accordingly and any shortfall recoverable against specified assets. Plaintiffs 5 to 7 failed to establish any enforceable maintenance right under the agreement. The claim to partition the golden howdah was also rejected because the evidence showed it had not remained a subject of fresh partition. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 28 Oct 1969 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275594