<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1922 (12) TMI 1 - PRIVY COUNCIL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275592</link>
    <description>The Privy Council upheld the lower courts&#039; decisions, dismissing the appeal and affirming that succession to the Lachmipur Raj estate was governed by Hindu law, allowing for succession by adoption. The court rejected the plaintiffs&#039; arguments on jurisdiction, custom barring adoption, and burden of proof, finding in favor of the defendant who was recognized as the adopted son in official clan documents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 1922 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2018 14:53:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=537623" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1922 (12) TMI 1 - PRIVY COUNCIL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275592</link>
      <description>The Privy Council upheld the lower courts&#039; decisions, dismissing the appeal and affirming that succession to the Lachmipur Raj estate was governed by Hindu law, allowing for succession by adoption. The court rejected the plaintiffs&#039; arguments on jurisdiction, custom barring adoption, and burden of proof, finding in favor of the defendant who was recognized as the adopted son in official clan documents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 1922 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275592</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>