https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275591 A transfer by the holder of an impartible estate to a younger son in lieu of customary maintenance was treated as a maintenance settlement, not a sale or a gift under section 23(1) of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950. Because the deed reflected discharge of an existing maintenance obligation and involved no money consideration, it fell outside the statutory bar on recognition of such transfers. A remand for alleged procedural irregularities was also found unnecessary, as no disputed question of fact arose and the maintenance right was not denied in the pleadings. The challenge therefore failed. en-us Thu, 11 Sep 1969 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 09 Oct 2018 14:46:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275591 A transfer by the holder of an impartible estate to a younger son in lieu of customary maintenance was treated as a maintenance settlement, not a sale or a gift under section 23(1) of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950. Because the deed reflected discharge of an existing maintenance obligation and involved no money consideration, it fell outside the statutory bar on recognition of such transfers. A remand for alleged procedural irregularities was also found unnecessary, as no disputed question of fact arose and the maintenance right was not denied in the pleadings. The challenge therefore failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 11 Sep 1969 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275591