<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (6) TMI 8 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14762</link>
    <description>The court found the proposed reopening of completed assessments to be illegal and without jurisdiction as there was no evidence of income escapement. The court quashed the reopening proceedings and allowed both writ petitions challenging the validity of the notices issued under sections 147(a) and 148 to 153 of the Income-tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 15:10:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=53762" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (6) TMI 8 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14762</link>
      <description>The court found the proposed reopening of completed assessments to be illegal and without jurisdiction as there was no evidence of income escapement. The court quashed the reopening proceedings and allowed both writ petitions challenging the validity of the notices issued under sections 147(a) and 148 to 153 of the Income-tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14762</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>