<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (5) TMI 15 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14760</link>
    <description>A sum received by the assessee was treated as a share in reserve held before bifurcation, not as taxable income, because the Tribunal&#039;s finding was based on the record and was neither shown to be illegal nor perverse. On that factual basis, the Revenue&#039;s challenge did not raise any question of law. The amount was therefore treated as a non-taxable capital receipt, and the reference was decided in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 15:06:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=53760" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (5) TMI 15 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14760</link>
      <description>A sum received by the assessee was treated as a share in reserve held before bifurcation, not as taxable income, because the Tribunal&#039;s finding was based on the record and was neither shown to be illegal nor perverse. On that factual basis, the Revenue&#039;s challenge did not raise any question of law. The amount was therefore treated as a non-taxable capital receipt, and the reference was decided in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14760</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>