https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275586 The Supreme Court held that a co-ordinate Bench cannot overturn another Bench's decision in the same High Court. It emphasized the need for judicial discipline and finality of court orders. The cancellation of bail by one judge based on observations in another case was deemed unauthorized. The Court reinstated the appellant's bail, stressing that the State can seek cancellation based on valid grounds, to be heard by the Chief Justice or a different Judge. The decision aimed to maintain fairness, uphold judicial discipline, and prevent endless attempts to revisit matters before different Benches. en-us Tue, 10 Sep 1991 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 09 Oct 2018 12:02:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275586 The Supreme Court held that a co-ordinate Bench cannot overturn another Bench's decision in the same High Court. It emphasized the need for judicial discipline and finality of court orders. The cancellation of bail by one judge based on observations in another case was deemed unauthorized. The Court reinstated the appellant's bail, stressing that the State can seek cancellation based on valid grounds, to be heard by the Chief Justice or a different Judge. The decision aimed to maintain fairness, uphold judicial discipline, and prevent endless attempts to revisit matters before different Benches. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 10 Sep 1991 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275586