<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (4) TMI 15 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14758</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petition, upholding the validity of the order passed under section 269UD and the valuation determined by the appropriate authority. The court found that the petitioners&#039; arguments regarding the invalidity of the second statement and the amendment order under section 269UJ were not sustainable. The court concluded, &quot;For the aforesaid reasons, the writ petition fails and it is dismissed. No costs.&quot;</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 15:01:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=53758" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (4) TMI 15 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14758</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petition, upholding the validity of the order passed under section 269UD and the valuation determined by the appropriate authority. The court found that the petitioners&#039; arguments regarding the invalidity of the second statement and the amendment order under section 269UJ were not sustainable. The court concluded, &quot;For the aforesaid reasons, the writ petition fails and it is dismissed. No costs.&quot;</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14758</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>