https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275578 The court concluded that "sufficient cause" for condonation of delay is a question of fact, not principle. Administrative delays must be supported by factual reasons to be considered sufficient cause. The merits of the substantive matter cannot outweigh the need to establish sufficient cause for delay condonation. Each case must be evaluated based on its specific circumstances, and the court must exercise discretion judiciously in granting condonation. The applications were to be reviewed by the Division Bench following these principles. en-us Fri, 06 May 1994 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 09 Oct 2018 10:42:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275578 The court concluded that "sufficient cause" for condonation of delay is a question of fact, not principle. Administrative delays must be supported by factual reasons to be considered sufficient cause. The merits of the substantive matter cannot outweigh the need to establish sufficient cause for delay condonation. Each case must be evaluated based on its specific circumstances, and the court must exercise discretion judiciously in granting condonation. The applications were to be reviewed by the Division Bench following these principles. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 06 May 1994 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275578