<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1712 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275568</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, quashing the reassessment orders under Section 148 and deleting the additions made by the AO. Emphasizing the need for proper evidence and procedural fairness, the Tribunal held that suspicion alone cannot replace evidence. The decisions in favor of the assessee were consistent across different assessment years, leading to the allowance of all five appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2018 06:49:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=537553" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1712 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275568</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, quashing the reassessment orders under Section 148 and deleting the additions made by the AO. Emphasizing the need for proper evidence and procedural fairness, the Tribunal held that suspicion alone cannot replace evidence. The decisions in favor of the assessee were consistent across different assessment years, leading to the allowance of all five appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275568</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>