<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 441 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368475</link>
    <description>The court held that the delay in granting the refund of excess tax to the Trust was unjustified, emphasizing the need for timely implementation of judicial orders. It ruled that additional interest under Section 244A(1A) applies from 1st June 2016 onwards for delayed refunds. While no further interest or compensation was awarded beyond statutory provisions, the respondent was directed to pay costs of Rs. 1,00,000 for the unexplained delay. The court also instructed the Department to expedite processing of orders for the petitioner and related entities to prevent unnecessary litigation. The petition was disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 16:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=537536" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 441 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368475</link>
      <description>The court held that the delay in granting the refund of excess tax to the Trust was unjustified, emphasizing the need for timely implementation of judicial orders. It ruled that additional interest under Section 244A(1A) applies from 1st June 2016 onwards for delayed refunds. While no further interest or compensation was awarded beyond statutory provisions, the respondent was directed to pay costs of Rs. 1,00,000 for the unexplained delay. The court also instructed the Department to expedite processing of orders for the petitioner and related entities to prevent unnecessary litigation. The petition was disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368475</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>